• thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Remember, Mr Rogers was a good neighbor. He was also a marine scout sniper. He wouldn’t have put up with the shit that’s happening now.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 hours ago

      And we are unfortunately vulnerable to regression. It’s sad to think that if Mr Rogers was around today his show would probably be attached to an executive order to have his funding cut.

      I don’t know if a similar show would be influential in today’s media market. Not just because it would be considered “woke” by half the population, but because the content would be like watching paint dry for a lot of kids.

      I think a big part of learning empathy is wrapped up in learning how to be patient, and how to appreciate someone’s company enough to allot them your time and attention. I just don’t think people value patience very much anymore and wonder if our media reflects that or it’s vice versa.

    • laserm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Just wait until you hear that the US fully repealed all laws penalizing sodomy (which included homosexual intercourse) between two consenting adults in 2003, when the Supreme Court declared that such laws were unconstitutional under the equal protection clause (Lawrence V Texas).

      The progress in that regard was fortunately very quick. In 2009, first states started legalizing gay marriage, in 2013 SCOTUS decided that even gay pairs from states that banned gay marriage can receive benefits if they have a valid marriage license from a states that allowed it (US v Windsor), striking down the shameful Defense of Marriage Act, and in 2015, it was at last decided that the constitution protects gay marriage, making it legal in all states (Oberfeller et al V Hodges). In 2020, in an opinion paradoxically written by Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, the court decided that the protection guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applied to LGBTQ folks as well (Bostock V Clayton County).

    • Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I know! I’m in my 40s and queer, I’m always stunned by how different young people’s attitudes are to lgbt now.

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Eh, longer than I’ve been alive. It can take a while sometimes, but there was a lot of resistance to overcome. That kind of racism wasn’t something that could be easily overcome with a law, certainly not with screaming/fighting, or murder, or stealing & burning shit down; this racism was inscribed on the hearts of others by their parents, families, communities…things done in anger & blind hatred only perpetuate it. This lingering racial discrimination required public actions like this to erase it. Humility, acceptance, quiet persistence, love. Qualities & traits that don’t exactly abound in today’s so-called “culture”, if you ask me.

      This is not a super popular thing to say & it doesn’t map onto this racial discrimination at all, but generally speaking you wouldn’t want a society that’s quick to change. Prone to flights of fancy, turning this way & that in the wind. You want society to be strong, cohesive, truly united, and defined/driven by a set of agreed upon values. I see a lot of people pulling a lot of different directions. We can’t agree on anything, and sometimes, our goals are even in direct opposition. It’s hard to build & maintain a strong society when we can’t agree on a sturdy foundation, the things we stand for.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    …so this is some real pedantic shit I’m about to do here, and I apologize in advance, but that’s the wrong picture. François Clemmons was on the show between 1968 and 1993. The original episode where they share a pool aired in 1969, and both men were much younger. The picture above is from Clemmons final appearance on the show in 1993, titled “Love,” where they again share a foot pool. I know this because my toddler has become Mr. Rogers obsessed and I’ve seen the 1993 episode 3 dozen times in the last month.

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It is gloriously pedantic, and it’s good to be specific! Thank you for the additional info. 🙂

      1993 sounds about right, because I feel like I’ve seen it & it didn’t feel like an old or retro episode (neither was I thinking, “Why is that black man sharing a foot pool with a white man?” But I think my parents carefully explained why this was significant, what racism was (/is), and I thought it was ridiculous. Because it is.).

      That’s a good obsession to have, raise them right. Mr. Rogers was a good role model with great messages.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fair point, but that’s a question for the mods. If you want some obscure Mr. Rogers facts though, or theories on the Daniel Tiger timeline, I’m your guy.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 day ago

            Mr. Rogers really wanted to encourage children’s imaginations, but he didn’t want them to confuse fantasy and reality. That’s why there’s such a strong delineation between his house and the Neighborhood of Make Believe. He also did more than one, “behind the scenes,” episode to show the neighborhood wasn’t real, and even mentioned on occasion that his, “house,” was just his, “television house,” where he would visit with the viewer, not his real house where he lived (which explains why he leaves at the end of every episode). When Big Bird was set to do a crossover episode, Rogers initially wanted the puppeteer to remove the costume and show children how it worked. The puppeteer didn’t want to destroy Big Bird for children, so they compromised by only having Big Bird visit the Neighborhood of Make Believe. However, there are two regular characters (Handyman Negri and Mr. McFeely) who appear in both the Neighborhood of Make Believe and the Mr Rogers house, which potentially blurs the line between real and make believe.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                True, but to be fair, if I’d been watching Mr. Rogers as a kid and Big Bird showed up, ripped his own head off, and revealed a middle-aged man hiding inside, I probably would have been traumatized.

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              We need a motherfucking army of Mr Rogers and we need to airdrop them into every neighborhood in America.

              In case they meet resistance, I strongly feel they should also have lightsabers.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    2 days ago

    The image misses part of the story. He was a character on the show, officer Clemmons, and wasn’t just on this episode. And what’s more, he was gay and Fred Rogers knew and accepted him for it at a time that that was uncommon. This image makes it seem like a single random act of impersonal kindness but it was much more than that.

      • DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Technically that was a calculated movement of it’s time. They wanted a black character in a role that spoke to an easy childhood concept of authority to imply that power dynamically having black people in a dominant respected role in social spaces is a normal thing one doesn’t need to get upset over. Hence the whole friendly cop thing.

        They were aware through the gay black actor they had in the role that police was something minority communities had issues with but the hope at the time was that more diversity in the force would be a solve. It’s naive from a modern standpoint but they did try.

        It was sad that they purposefully kept the gay part of the actor’s identity under wraps. They knew they were asking him to do something harmful by keeping his private life strictly secret but the actor agreed that he was doing something he deemed worth the sacrifice.

    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Stolen from one of the top comments on this video, but it’s a great comment I thought worth repeating here:

      “Mr. Rogers didn’t say that you deserve success and material gratification merely for being yourself. Rather, when a world obsessed with competition and material success beats down on your soul, his message was to remind you that you still had one.”

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    it’s funny. anyone who actually watched Mr Rogers should know what I’m about to say.

    he didn’t want everybody to be just like him. he wanted to inspire children to be better versions of themselves.

    frankly, I’m not a nice person. never want to be, but I do try to be a good person.

    • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I grew up on Mr. Rogers, Bob Ross, etc. They’re a big part of what shaped me and made me empathetic. I live a good life but the world around me (the US) is determined to make me bitter and angry, and it’s an everyday struggle to keep my mind above water.

      I know if he were around today, he would still manage to always keep a cool head and a grounded spirit, despite knowing where this country is headed.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I’m an asshole, I know I’m an asshole, but I do try to not make it a problem for other people and I think watching his show as a kid definitely helped me to be better about that.

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same, I lost my shit with someone at the DMV because I needed one of those new ‘real’ IDs because I really needed to travel. But I lost my birth certificate in a fire and so i couldn’t even get that. I had to take time off work to try and get and they were pissed about that. So now I am going through this while being angry with myself and I took it out on someone who didn’t deserve it because I was a bitch who needed to be angry at someone else.

      I hate myself so much.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        don’t be too hard on yourself. the fact that you’re remorseful about it should be all the proof you need to show that you were just having a bad day(or couple months).

        even Mr. Rogers had bad days. it’s about dealing with your feelings and owning them.

        if you feel that bad you should send the person some chocolates or just straight up apologize for your behavior. who knows, maybe it’ll make their own horrible day alittle better.

  • seeigel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    That segregation, was that in the entire USA? How was it introduced for the entire USA when the North fought for the freedom of the black population?

    • DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      It really isn’t that simple. The north didn’t have as much strict segregation but in a way it was because they didn’t have to. Economic pressure reinforced by subversive hiring practices, prejudice in housing and hostile attitudes kept black communities tight knit and localized which meant you didn’t have to have specific “Colored schools” because they were created by these forces squeezing folks together into controllable blocks of population.

      In the South the fall of segregation had a number of nasty fallouts which harmed black communities as well. When they merged the systems there was a historicly significant loss of black teachers. People got up in arms over really stupid questions like “What if my menstruating daughter had a black male teacher” and that prejudice ensured that a lot of the teachers who understood the challenges of being black in America were no longer in a position to help students.

      This meant that effectively in the North segregated schooling continued to be a thing in practice but not in name while in the South it wiped out infrastructure that was helping black students succeed. It was handled incredibly poorly and was not unambiguously good but it did change a lot of the legal categorizations and is considered a win.

      • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s was not a terrible idea for the time. It backfired horrendously and the n US ignored the hell out of it l. Honestly, it was pretty much the history of Isreal

        • I think it was a terrible idea because it was just more colonization. Just like Israel it’s not like Liberia was just empty. There were more than enough resources for integration, they were just unevenly distributed, history of capitalism blah blah.

          • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            They pretty much believed in fucking magic at the time. There was more evidence that the two races were incompatible then there was a lot of other stupid things believed back then. Plus if you are going to fuck someone over it might as well be someone not in your country then someone who is. I guess. Still not good though.

      • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Deep down in that shallow little pool.

        Still an absolutely amazing bit of knowledge that was simply shared in the wrong place.

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      meme

      /miːm/

      noun

      1. A unit of cultural information, such as a cultural practice or idea, that is transmitted verbally or by repeated action from one mind to another.
      2. A self-propagating unit of cultural evolution having a resemblance to the gene by (the unit of genetics).
      3. A thought, idea, joke, or concept that spreads online, often virally. Can be in the form of an image, a video, an email, an animation, or music.
      4. A cultural unit (an idea or value or pattern of behavior) that is passed from one person to another by non-genetic means (as by imitation).