• Merva@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The thing is that nuclear energy could have been used to replace other things that uses oil energy instead. It could have lowered carbon emissions, instead it just adds to energy expense.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As long as nuclear is required to be 1000x safer (not even hyperbole) than fossil fuels it will be expensive to run and the cost of nuclear for running home electricity is more than the average person wants to spend. So it wasn’t really going to replace a lot of other uses of oil anyway