You seem to be arguing the same point I am from a different perspective; he would have to be at least 16 to be “at least 30” as the other commenter said. I am also arguing against precluding several years of age that the boy in the photo could be all of which would result in him being less than 30 today.
You seem to be arguing the same point I am from a different perspective; he would have to be at least 16 to be “at least 30” as the other commenter said. I am also arguing against precluding several years of age that the boy in the photo could be all of which would result in him being less than 30 today.
You two sound like my siblings during a long car ride. Just arguing over the dumbest shit that doesn’t matter…
Besides, even if they’re in their twenties, they’re old enough to buy their own shit! :P